A comparison of the workload between pediatric and adult ophthalmology encounters

J AAPOS. 2021 Jun;25(3):160.e1-160.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Jun 3.

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the differences in workload between pediatric and adult ophthalmology encounters in the private clinics of an academic medical center.

Methods: Complete encounters from four different subspecialties were analysed: pediatric ophthalmology, pediatric ophthalmology/neuroophthalmology, anterior segment, and retina. Five parameters were studied: time waiting for assistant, time with assistant, time waiting for physician, time with physician, and total visit time. Imaging or procedures performed during the clinic visit were recorded. A regression analysis by age was also performed.

Results: Of 8,545 clinic visits reviewed, 5,611 were complete and included. Pediatric patients spent more time than adults with assistants (10.6 ± 11.5 vs 7.3 ± 6.8 min; P < 0.001) and more time with physicians (25.9 ± 21.6 vs 17.0 ± 13.8 min; P < 0.001) but less time waiting for the physician. Total visit time and time waiting for an assistant did not differ significantly between groups. Adults who underwent a procedure or imaging during their visit had significantly longer times in most components of the encounter. Age was positively correlated with time waiting for physician, time with physician, and total visit time in the adult group. In the pediatric group, age was positively correlated with time with assistant and negatively correlated with time with physician.

Conclusions: Our study showed that pediatric patients waited a shorter duration for their physicians than adults; however, they required more time with both the physician and the assistant. Total visit time was similar between groups.

MeSH terms

  • Academic Medical Centers
  • Adult
  • Child
  • Humans
  • Ophthalmology*
  • Time Factors
  • Workload*