One method for detecting radiotherapy treatment errors is to capture the exit dose using an electronic portal imaging device. In comparison with a baseline integrated image, subsequent fractions can be compared and differences in images suggest a difference in the radiation treatment delivered. The aim of this work was to assess the sensitivity of a commercial software PerFRACTION in detecting such differences, arising from three possible sources: (i) changes in the radiation beam or EPID position; (ii) changes in the patient position; and (iii) changes in the patient anatomy. By systematically introducing errors, PerFRACTION was shown to be very sensitive to changes in the radiation beam. Variation in the beam output could be detected within 0.3%, field size within 0.4 mm, collimator rotation within 0.3° and MLC positioning could be verified to within 0.1 mm. EPID misalignment could be detected within 0.3 mm. PerFRACTION was able to detect the mispositioning of an anthropomorphic phantom by 3 mm with static beams, however there was a relative dependency between the patient geometry and the direction of the shift. VMAT beams were less sensitive to patient misalignments, with a shift of 10 mm only detectable once a strict criterion of 1% dose difference was applied. In another simulated scenario PerFRACTION was also able to detect a weight loss equivalent to a 5 mm change in patient separation in VMAT plans and 10 mm in conformal plans. This work showed that the PerFRACTION software could be relied upon to detect potential radiotherapy treatment errors, arising from a variety of sources.
Keywords: EPID; errors; monitoring; radiotherapy.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.