Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for labour pain management: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

J Clin Nurs. 2021 Dec;30(23-24):3398-3414. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15865. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To compare and rank the efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions in the management of labour pain.

Background: Recently, various non-pharmacological interventions have been applied to manage labour pain and have shown positive effects. However, evidence identifying which type of non-pharmacological intervention is more efficient and safer is limited.

Design: Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis based on PRISMA-NMA.

Methods: Seven databases were searched from database inception-March 2020. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, quality appraisal and data extraction. Conventional meta-analysis was conducted using either fixed-effects model or random-effects model according to statistical heterogeneity. The Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using the consistency model.

Results: 43 studies involving nine non-pharmacological interventions were included. The Bayesian network meta-analysis showed that acupressure (SMD = -2.00, 95% CrI -3.09 to -0.94), aromatherapy (SMD = -2.01, 95% CrI -3.70 to -0.35) and massage therapy (SMD = -1.26, 95% CrI -2.26 to -0.30) had significant positive effects on alleviating labour pain, with aromatherapy being the most effective. The results also revealed that yoga (SMD = -130.85, 95% CrI -212.01 to -59.32) and acupressure (SMD = -10.14, 95% CrI -20.24 to -0.41) were the most effective interventions for shortening the first stage and the second stage of labour, respectively. There were no significant differences between non-pharmacological interventions and usual care or placebo control on the use of pharmacological methods and neonatal 5-min Apgar score.

Conclusions: The evidence in this network meta-analysis illustrates that non-pharmacological interventions are effective and safe for labour pain management in low-risk pregnant women. In the future, well-designed studies are needed to validate the conclusion of this network meta-analysis.

Relevance to clinical practice: The results support the use of non-pharmacological interventions, especially aromatherapy and acupressure, to relieve labour pain in low-risk pregnant women. Non-pharmacological interventions for labour pain management are recommended to apply according to maternal women's preference and values.

Keywords: labour pain; network meta-analysis; non-pharmacological interventions; pain management; systematic review.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Acupressure*
  • Analgesics
  • Bayes Theorem
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Labor Pain* / therapy
  • Network Meta-Analysis
  • Pregnancy

Substances

  • Analgesics