Background: Evidence supports scheduling early follow-up after heart failure (HF) hospitalization with a provider capable of managing hypervolemia. Often this service is provided by cardiologists or specialty nurse practitioners. Continuity or "familiar" providers may be better positioned to identify decompensating HF in patients who have advanced HF and/or multiple complicating medical problems. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a clinical pharmacy specialist (CPS) service, covering the role of a "familiar" provider in an advanced HF specialty clinic (AHFC) during a staffing shortage, may prevent readmission metrics from worsening.
Methods: We evaluated the entire, eligible concurrent cohorts, representing 175 AHFC-CPS and 273 control patient-admissions, respectively. Study- and disease-specific predictors for readmission were assessed. A matched cohort of 202 patient-admissions (101 AHFC-CPS:101 NO-CPS) were evaluated.
Results: Subjects were predominantly white, elderly males. While overall "clinic [performance] profiling" outcomes for readmissions (p = 0.43) and mortality (p = 0.66) did not statistically differ between the AHFC-CPS and NO-CPS groups, an imbalance in severity of illness persisted. A survival curve and analysis were constructed, and the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 0.69 (p = 0.033).
Conclusions: This retrospective project supports the premise that AHFC-CPS intervention may be a suitable alternative to maintain the volume status for AHFC patients during a staffing short-fall. More work needs to be done to determine intervention effect size, predictors for readmission, specifically in advanced cardiovascular disease, and to evaluate CPS opportunities in the provision of independent HF care, particularly for patients with advanced HF.
Keywords: heart failure; pharmacists; readmissions; retrospective study; transitions of care.