Because Fusarium head blight (FHB) intensity is usually highly variable within a plot, the number of spikes rated for FHB index (IND) quantification must be considered when designing experiments. In addition, quantification of sources of IND heterogeneity is crucial for defining sampling protocols. Field experiments were conducted to quantify the variability of IND ("field severity") at different spatial scales and to investigate the effects of sample size on estimated plot-level mean IND and its accuracy. A total of 216 7-row × 6-m-long plots of a moderately resistant and a susceptible cultivar were spray-inoculated with different Fusarium graminearum spore concentrations at anthesis to generate a range of IND levels. A one-stage cluster sampling approach was used to estimate IND, with an average of 32 spikes rated at each of 10 equally spaced points per plot. Plot-level mean IND ranged from 0.9 to 37.9%. Heterogeneity of IND, quantified by fitting unconditional hierarchical linear models, was higher among spikes within clusters than among clusters within plots or among plots. The projected relative error of mean IND increased as mean IND decreased, and as sample size decreased to <100 spikes per plot. Simple random samples were drawn with replacement 50,000 times from the original dataset for each plot and used to estimate the effects of sample sizes on mean IND. Samples of 100 or more spikes resulted in more precise estimates of mean IND than smaller samples. Poor sampling may result in inaccurate estimates of IND and poor interpretation of results.
Keywords: computational biology; data science; epidemiology.