Kinematic comparison between asymmetrical and symmetrical polyethylene inserts during deep knee bend activity

Abstract

Background: The in vivo kinematic benefit of an asymmetrical polyethylene insert is still unknown in comparison with that of a symmetrical insert with the same femoral component design. The purpose of this study was to analyze the kinematic differences between symmetrical and asymmetrical polyethylene inserts and to detect the kinematic benefit in the asymmetrical polyethylene insert. The hypotheses are that greater axial rotation and more posterior rollback are observed in the asymmetrical polyethylene insert.

Methods: The patients were randomly allocated to the following two groups: total knee arthroplasty with a symmetrical insert and with an asymmetrical insert. In vivo knee kinematics was analyzed in asymmetrical (17 knees) and symmetrical (16 knees) inserts using an image matching technique. The symmetrical polyethylene insert had the same geometry on both sides, whereas the asymmetrical polyethylene insert had a flat surface on the postero-lateral side. The anterior/posterior position and axial rotation were compared between the two polyethylene inserts.

Results: The femoral component was significantly positioned posteriorly at 70° (p = 0.016) and 80° (p = 0.040) of knee flexion and externally rotated at 80° of knee flexion (p = 0.040) in the asymmetrical polyethylene insert as compared to the position of the symmetrical polyethylene insert. Femoral rollback and axial rotation from full extension to maximum flexion were greater in the asymmetrical polyethylene insert, although the difference was not significant.

Conclusions: In the asymmetrical polyethylene insert, slight kinematic benefit with greater axial rotation and more posterior rollback was observed in comparison with the symmetrical polyethylene insert. Further research should be required whether the kinematic benefit of an asymmetrical polyethylene insert will lead to better patient satisfaction and function.