Reforestation may help protect the health of endangered forest ecosystems. To implement this action, it is important to evaluate the effects of the planted species on soil quality. Previous studies have demonstrated that soil properties are closely driven by the effects of plant roots and plant remains (quantity and quality) reaching the soil surface. However, little research is available about the effects of plant species on soil quality of reforested sites compared to natural forest ecosystems. This study evaluates the changes in the main soil properties between two 30-40 year-old stand types in forest areas of northern Iran: i) two stands, each one comprising a natural species (Parrotia persica or Pinus taeda); and ii) two stands, each one with planted trees (Quercus castaneifolia or Alnus glutinosa). Compared to reforested sites, the soils with natural trees showed higher root weight density (+43%), pH (+17%), and organic carbon (+64%). These differences led to higher nutrient contents, microbial respiration, aggregate stability, and water retention in soils with natural trees, as confirmed by the correlation analysis. A principal component analysis provided a meaningful combined factor (the first principal component) that showed a clear discrimination in soil quality and fertility among natural and reforested species. The calculation of a soil quality index confirms that planted species may lead to an overall lower quality of soils with planted species compared to natural forest. Since the lower soil quality of planted forests can be also the result of unsuitable management practices, this study suggest that forest operations in reforested areas should be avoided, since this could lead to negative effects on soil quality and contribute to an increase in the risk of soil degradation.
Keywords: Forest management; Microbial respiration; Nutrient content; Organic carbon; Reforestation.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.