Terminal chaperonage embedded in palliative care deeply resonates with human needs and has undergone significant advances in the past decades. At the same time, it is in jeopardy due to austerity measures in healthcare. Its comprehensive translation in philanthropic end-of-life practice necessitates reflection on underlying ethical issues. This chapter addresses ethical aspects arising in pain and terminal chaperonage and deduces important ethical imperatives in the wake of the palliative mandate. The imperatives affect the deployment of resources necessary for a humane pain and terminal chaperonage, one that is to be comprehensive and flexible in design and implementation at the same time. Furthermore, they are concerned with critical implications for dying clients emerging from the idiosyncratic properties of opioids with respect to their potential to induce mental status alterations. Given that living and dying are profoundly mental by nature, the human mind plays a fundamental role in the command of both. Based on this, this chapter also outlines the essentials of terminal thought plasticity and affect catharsis en route to a mindful, decent death. It identifies and advocates eight most fundamental affective, respectively cognitive fields of the human mind, the "Ensemble of the essential eight iridescent fields of relinquishment", whose adaptable, culturally sensitive facilitation in mental management prior to death may have to be considered the core ethical imperative in terminal chaperonage - in true congruence with philanthropic end-of-life care.
Keywords: Affect; Decent death; Dying; Emotion; End of life; Ethical imperative; Human mind; Mindful death; Opioids; Pain; Palliative; Philanthropy; Terminal chaperonage; Thought.