Background: Limb salvage procedures have become more prevalent in orthopedic oncology. Endoprostheses have been used successfully to reconstruct large skeletal deficits. The aim was to review intermediate to long-term follow-up of distal femoral replacements in the setting of neoplastic disease about the knee.
Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study from 1997 to 2018 in a national referral center for oncology. The secondary objectives were to describe morbidity and mortality in this cohort. We recorded the modes of failure using Henderson classification system, complications, revisions, and all further operations.
Results: Seventy-two distal femoral replacements were performed. Osteosarcoma was the most common indication (55 patients). Other indications included chondrosarcoma (7 patients), giant cell tumor (5 patients), Ewing's sarcoma (2 patients), metastatic spread (2 patients), and leiomyosarcoma (1 patient). One-year mortality was 1.38% with an overall mortality of 13.8%, at the end of the study period. The 1-year revision rate was 4.2%, 30.5% for 10 years, and 38.8% for more than 15 years. The overall implant survival rate was 63.8%. The most common reasons for failure included aseptic loosening (16.6%), infection (16.6%), and local recurrence (9.7%) with an amputation rate of 6.9% in the cohort.
Conclusion: Neoplastic disease of the lower limb is associated with significant morbidity. Aseptic loosening (16.6%) and infection (16.6%) were the most common reasons for failure in this cohort.
Keywords: Distal femoral replacement; Endoprosthesis; Megaprosthesis; Osteosarcoma; Tumor.
© 2021 The Authors.