The Duration of Denosumab Treatment and the Efficacy of Zoledronate to Preserve Bone Mineral Density After Its Discontinuation

Abstract

Context: Zoledronate is used to prevent bone loss following denosumab discontinuation but its efficacy differs among studies.

Objective: To test if the duration of denosumab treatment affects the efficacy of subsequent zoledronate infusion.

Methods: This multicenter, prospective cohort study, conducted at 2 Greek and 1 Dutch bone centers, included 47 postmenopausal women (n = 47) who received a single zoledronate infusion 6 months after the last denosumab injection and then were followed for 1 year. Twenty-seven women received ≤ 6 denosumab injections (≤ 6 Group) and 20 received > 6 denosumab injections (> 6 Group). The main outcome measure was changes in lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD).

Results: At 12 months LS-BMD values were maintained in the ≤ 6 Group (0.98 ± 0.10 to 0.99 ± 0.9 g/cm2, P = 0.409) but decreased significantly in the > 6 Group (1.0 ± 0.11 to 0.93 ± 0.12 g/cm2, P < 0.001). The percent change of LS-BMD of the ≤ 6 Group (+1.0%) was significantly different (P < 0.001) from the change of the > 6 Group (-7.0%). In the whole cohort, the duration of denosumab treatment was negatively correlated with the percentage change of LS-BMD (rs = -0.669, P < 0.001) but not with the change of femoral neck (FN)-BMD. Bone turnover markers increased in all patients 6 months following zoledronate administration with no difference between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: The duration of denosumab treatment significantly affects the efficacy of subsequent zoledronate infusion to maintain BMD gains. Frequent follow-up of patients treated with denosumab longer than 3 years is advisable as additional therapeutic interventions may be needed.

Keywords: bone mineral density; bone turnover markers; denosumab; postmenopausal osteoporosis; zoledronate.