Risk-adjusted rates between hospitals for adverse outcomes of very-low-birth-weight infants

Abstract

Background/purpose: To analyze the amount of variation in these risk-adjusted adverse outcomes corresponding to the care of premature births. In addition, hospitals were ranked according to their unadjusted and adjusted rates, and we assessed the degree of concordance between these rankings. Finally, the correlations of hospital-adjusted adverse outcomes were also tested.

Methods: The study utilized the 5-year Taiwan Premature Infant Follow-up Network (TPFN) database in Taiwan from 2014 to 2018, and the sample size was 6482. We calculated the "observed over expected" (OE) ratio every year to form the risk-adjusted adverse outcome rate for each hospital.

Results: There was a larger variation in the risk-adjusted rate for NEC and the second-largest variation for IVH. Regarding the concordances between the unadjusted and adjusted ranks, the ranks for mortality had the lowest concordance (coefficient of concordance 0.64), and only a few of the risk-adjusted rates between outcomes were significantly correlated.

Conclusion: The results of the TPFN show that there is room to improve performance in terms of large variations in NEC and IVH. Furthermore, risk adjustment is important, especially for mortality, since the ranks for mortality have the lowest concordance. Finally, we cannot generate a conclusion regarding whether a hospital is high in quality if we only take 1 or 2 adverse outcomes as profiling measures because only a few of the risk-adjusted rates between outcomes were significantly correlated.

Keywords: Morbidity; Mortality; Premature birth; Risk adjustment.