Influence of hunting strategy on foraging efficiency in Galapagos sea lions

PeerJ. 2021 Apr 13:9:e11206. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11206. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The endangered Galapagos sea lion (GSL, Zalophus wollebaeki) exhibits a range of foraging strategies utilising various dive types including benthic, epipelagic and mesopelagic dives. In the present study, potential prey captures (PPC), prey energy consumption and energy expenditure in lactating adult female GSLs (n = 9) were examined to determine their foraging efficiency relative to the foraging strategy used. Individuals displayed four dive types: (a) epipelagic (<100 m; EP); or (b) mesopelagic (>100 m; MP) with a characteristic V-shape or U-shape diving profile; and (c) shallow benthic (<100 m; SB) or (d) deep benthic (>100 m; DB) with square or flat-bottom dive profiles. These dive types varied in the number of PPC, assumed prey types, and the energy expended. Prey items and their energetic value were assumed from previous GSL diet studies in combination with common habitat and depth ranges of the prey. In comparison to pelagic dives occurring at similar depths, when diving benthically, GSLs had both higher prey energy consumption and foraging energy expenditure whereas PPC rate was lower. Foraging efficiency varied across dive types, with benthic dives being more profitable than pelagic dives. Three foraging trip strategies were identified and varied relative to prey energy consumed, energy expended, and dive behaviour. Foraging efficiency did not significantly vary among the foraging trip strategies suggesting that, while individuals may diverge into different foraging habitats, they are optimal within them. These findings indicate that these three strategies will have different sensitivities to habitat-specific fluctuations due to environmental change.

Keywords: Accelerometers; Dive behaviour; Feeding; Galapagos Islands; Pinniped; Telemetry; Zalophus wollebaeki.

Grants and funding

The field work and sampling stages of this research were funded by Universidad San Francisco de Quito (GAIAS grant 2012-2013). Satellite telemetry expenses were funded by the Office of Naval Research, the E&P Sound and Marine Life Joint Industry Project of the IAGOP (#JIP 2207-23). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.