Double-blinded manuscript review: Avoiding peer review bias

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Jul 1;91(1):e39-e42. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003260.

Authors

Ariel Santos¹, David S Morris, Rishi Rattan, Tanya Zakrison

Affiliation

¹ From the Division of Trauma, Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care (A.S.), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas; Division of Trauma, Intermountain Medical Center (D.S.M.), Murray, Utah; Division of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care (R.R.), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; and Division of Trauma (T.Z.), University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois.

PMID: 33901050
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003260

No abstract available

Publication types

Historical Article

MeSH terms

Double-Blind Method
History, 17th Century
History, 18th Century
History, 21st Century
History, Medieval
Humans
Peer Review, Research / methods*
Peer Review, Research / standards
Peer Review, Research / trends
Publishing / history
Publishing / standards
Publishing / trends*