Nomograms predicting the overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with stage IIIC1 cervical cancer

BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 23;21(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08209-5.

Abstract

Background: To explore the factors that affect the prognosis of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with stage IIIC1 cervical cancer and establish nomogram models to predict this prognosis.

Methods: Data from patients in the Surveil-lance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programme meeting the inclusion criteria were classified into a training group, and validation data were obtained from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from 2010 to 2019. The incidence, Kaplan-Meier curves, OS and CSS of patients with stage IIIC1 cervical cancer in the training group were evaluated. Nomograms were established according to the results of univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. Harrell's C-index, calibration plots, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision-curve analysis (DCA) were calculated to validate the prediction models.

Results: The incidence of pelvic lymph node metastasis, a high-risk factor for the prognosis of cervical cancer, decreased slightly over time. Eight independent prognostic variables were identified for OS, including age, race, marriage status, histology, extension range, tumour size, radiotherapy and surgery, but only seven were identified for CSS, with marriage status excluded. Nomograms of OS and CSS were established based on the results. The C-indexes for the nomograms of OS and CSS were 0.687 and 0.692, respectively, using random sampling of SEER data sets and 0.701 and 0.735, respectively, using random sampling of external data sets. The AUCs for the nomogram of OS were 0.708 and 0.705 for the SEER data sets and 0.750 and 0.750 for the external data sets, respectively. In addition, AUCs of 0.707 and 0.709 were obtained for the nomogram of CSS when validated using SEER data sets, and 0.788 and 0.785 when validated using external data sets. Calibration plots for the nomograms were almost identical to the actual observations. The DCA also indicated the value of the two models.

Conclusions: Eight independent prognostic variables were identified for OS. The same factors predicted CSS, with the exception of the marriage status. Both OS and CSS nomograms had good predictive and clinical application value after validation. Notably, tumour size had the largest contribution to the OS and CSS nomograms.

Keywords: Cancer-special survival; Cervical cancer; FIGO; Nomogram; Overall survival.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Area Under Curve
  • Decision Support Techniques
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Lymph Nodes / pathology
  • Lymphatic Metastasis
  • Marital Status
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Nomograms*
  • Pelvis
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • SEER Program
  • Tumor Burden
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / ethnology
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / mortality*
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / therapy