Depicting the mating system and patterns of contemporary pollen flow in trees of the genus Anadenanthera (Fabaceae)

PeerJ. 2021 Apr 7:9:e10579. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10579. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Anadenanthera (Fabaceae) is endemic to the Neotropics and consists of two tree species: A. colubrina (Vell.) Brenan and A. peregrina (L.) Speg. This study examined the mating system and contemporary gene flow of A. colubrina (Acol) and A. peregrina (Aper) in a highly fragmented area of the Atlantic Forest to provide valuable information that informs conservation strategies. Reproductive adults from forest remnants [n A. colubrina = 30 (2.7 ha), n A. peregrina = 55 (4.0 ha)] and progeny-arrays (n A. colubrina = 322, n A. peregrina = 300) were genotyped for seven nuclear microsatellite markers. Mating system analyses revealed that A. colubrina is a mixed mating species (tm = 0.619) while A. peregrina is a predominantly outcrossing species (tm = 0.905). For both Anadenanthera species, high indices of biparental inbreeding were observed (Acol = 0.159, Aper = 0.216), resulting in low effective pollination neighborhood sizes. Categorical paternity analysis revealed different scales of pollen dispersal distance: the majority of crossings occurring locally (i.e., between nearby trees within the same population), with moderate pollen dispersal coming from outside the forest fragments boundaries (Acol mp = 30%, Aper mp = 35%). Nevertheless, pollen immigration from trees outside the populations for both species suggests that the populations are not reproductively isolated. This study highlights the importance of evaluating both mating system and contemporary gene flow for a better understanding of the biology of Anadenanthera species. This information should be considered to ensure the effective conservation and management practices of these plant species.

Keywords: Atlantic forest; Biparental inbreeding; Categorical paternity; Conservation genetics; Gene flow; Microsatellite markers.

Associated data

  • Dryad/10.5061/dryad.1vhhmgqqg

Grants and funding

This research was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da São Paulo (FAPESP, Grant 2011/08883-3 to Ana Lilia Alzate-Marin), Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq, Grant 470975/20113 to Ana Lilia Alzate-Marin), Fundação de Apoio ao Ensino, Pesquisa e Assistência do Hospital das Clínicas de Ribeirão Preto (FAEPA) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Programa de Excelência Acadêmica (CAPES-PROEX). It was also financed by CAPES—Finance Code 001. There was no additional external funding received for this study. Juliana Massimino Feres and Marcela Corbo Guidugli were supported by FAPESP DS fellowships (2009/14200-6 and 2007/04787-4, respectively). Fernando Bonifacio-Anacleto was supported by an IC-CNPq fellowship (134699/2012-2) and TTIII FAPESP fellowship (2013/18633). Ana Lilia Alzate-Marin was supported by a Research Assistantship from CNPq (PDS 150277/2009-1, PV 300140/2011-8). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.