Background: We modified the general application method of the pointed reduction clamp, focusing on the function of encompassing the fracture site, and applied it to femoral shaft fractures. The purpose of the present study is to describe the minimally invasive cerclage clamping technique (MICC) and compare radiological and clinical results of MICC with that of percutaneous cerclage wiring (PCW).
Materials and methods: A retrospective comparative study was performed in two institutions from 2010 to 2019. Patients aged ≥18 years with acute femoral shaft fractures that were treated with intramedullary nailing and reduced using MICC or PCW were included. Patients with open fractures, atypical fractures, and follow-up less than 12 months were excluded. A total of 68 patients were finally included and divided into two groups based on the reduction technique each patient underwent. We then compared radiological and clinical results between the two groups, including coronal and sagittal alignment, time for union, and complications.
Results: The average time needed for the technique in the MICC group was shorter than that in the PCW group (7.1±4.6 min vs. 11.5±4.8 min, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the quality of reduction or alignment between the two groups. The mean union time was not different between the two groups (24.1±8.7 weeks vs. 24.1±8.6 weeks, P = 0.990). The MICC group had one nonunion patient and the PCW group had one postoperative infection patient. There were no cases of major neurovascular injury such as femoral artery injury or sciatic nerve palsy.
Conclusions: MICC, using a pointed reduction clamp for nonisthmal femoral shaft fractures, demonstrated satisfactory reduction and favorable surgical outcomes with intramedullary nailing. We believe that MICC can be a reliable and safe reduction method for femoral shaft fractures.
Keywords: Cerclage; Cerclage wiring; Femoral fracture; Pointed reduction clamp.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.