A marathon, not a sprint - neuroimaging, Open Science and ethics

Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 1:236:118041. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118041. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

Abstract

Open Science is calling for a radical re-thinking of existing scientific practices. Within the neuroimaging community, Open Science practices are taking the form of open data repositories and open lab notebooks. The broad sharing of data that accompanies Open Science, however, raises some difficult ethical and legal issues. With neuroethics as a focusing lens, we explore eight central concerns posed by open data with regard to human brain imaging studies: respect for individuals and communities, concern for marginalized communities, consent, privacy protections, participatory research designs, contextual integrity, fusions of clinical and research goals, and incidental findings. Each consideration assists in bringing nuance to the potential benefits for open data sharing against associated challenges. We combine current understandings with forward-looking solutions to key issues. We conclude by underscoring the need for new policy tools to enhance the potential for responsible open data.

Keywords: Data governance; Neuroethics; Neuroimaging; Open Science; Research ethics.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bioethics*
  • Biomedical Research* / ethics
  • Biomedical Research* / standards
  • Brain / diagnostic imaging*
  • Community-Based Participatory Research / ethics
  • Community-Based Participatory Research / standards
  • Humans
  • Incidental Findings
  • Information Dissemination
  • Intersectoral Collaboration*
  • Neuroimaging* / ethics
  • Neuroimaging* / standards
  • Privacy*

Grants and funding