[Predatory journals: A real threat for medical research. 2 Assess their consequences and initiate a response]

Rev Med Interne. 2021 Jun;42(6):427-433. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2021.03.327. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
[Article in French]

Abstract

The deleterious consequences of "predatory" journals are numerous, whether the researcher submitted his work to them naively or knowingly: work little or not read by the international community in the absence of indexing and disappearance of any digital trace in the absence of archiving. The reputation of researchers but also of universities and research organizations and the credit of science for citizens can be sustainably damaged. These open access journals, with the author who pays as model, represent as many resources unavailable for legitimate journals. A joint mobilization of all the actors involved is necessary: researchers, universities and faculties of medicine, sections of the national university council, publishers of legitimate journals, research organizations, learned societies, ethics committees, funders, media and political decision-makers. Publishing in a predatory journal is now a scientific misconduct.

Keywords: Academic spam email; Ethique de la publication; Open access publication; Predatory journals; Publication en libre accès; Publication ethics; Revues prédatrices; Spam académique.

MeSH terms

  • Biomedical Research*
  • Humans
  • Open Access Publishing*
  • Periodicals as Topic*
  • Publishing
  • Universities