Post-extubation oxygenation strategies in acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Crit Care. 2021 Apr 9;25(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03550-4.

Abstract

Background: High-flow nasal cannula oxygenation (HFNC) and noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) possibly decrease tracheal reintubation rates better than conventional oxygen therapy (COT); however, few large-scale studies have compared HFNC and NPPV. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the effectiveness of three post-extubation respiratory support devices (HFNC, NPPV, and COT) in reducing the mortality and reintubation risk.

Methods: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ichushi databases were searched. COT, NPPV, and HFNC use were assessed in patients who were aged ≥ 16 years, underwent invasive mechanical ventilation for > 12 h for acute respiratory failure, and were scheduled for extubation after spontaneous breathing trials. The GRADE Working Group Approach was performed using a frequentist-based approach with multivariate random-effect meta-analysis. Short-term mortality and reintubation and post-extubation respiratory failure rates were compared.

Results: After evaluating 4631 records, 15 studies and 2600 patients were included. The main cause of acute hypoxic respiratory failure was pneumonia. Although NPPV/HFNC use did not significantly lower the mortality risk (relative risk [95% confidence interval] 0.75 [0.53-1.06] and 0.92 [0.67-1.27]; low and moderate certainty, respectively), HFNC use significantly lowered the reintubation risk (0.54 [0.32-0.89]; high certainty) compared to COT use. The associations of mortality with NPPV and HFNC use with respect to either outcome did not differ significantly (short-term mortality and reintubation, relative risk [95% confidence interval] 0.81 [0.61-1.08] and 1.02 [0.53-1.97]; moderate and very low certainty, respectively).

Conclusion: NPPV or HFNC use may not reduce the risk of short-term mortality; however, they may reduce the risk of endotracheal reintubation.

Trial registration number and date of registration: PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020139112, 01/21/2020).

Keywords: Conventional oxygen therapy; High-flow nasal cannula; Meta-analysis; Network meta-analysis; Noninvasive ventilation; Post-extubation; Systematic review.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Airway Extubation / adverse effects
  • Airway Extubation / methods*
  • Humans
  • Oxygen Inhalation Therapy / methods
  • Oxygen Inhalation Therapy / standards*
  • Respiratory Insufficiency / physiopathology
  • Respiratory Insufficiency / therapy*
  • Ventilator Weaning / methods