Although influenza vaccines are effective for reducing viral transmission and the severity of clinical symptoms, influenza viruses still induce considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide. Seasonal influenza viruses infect the upper respiratory tract initially but then often induce severe pulmonary complications in the lower respiratory tract. Therefore, influenza vaccines that prevent viral infection at both the upper and lower respiratory tracts are highly anticipated. Here, we examined whether using different vaccination routes for priming and boosting achieved protection in both regions of the respiratory tract. To this end, we used inactivated whole-virion influenza vaccines to immunize mice either subcutaneously or intranasally for both priming and boosting. Regardless of the route used for boosting, the levels of virus-specific IgG in plasma were higher in mice primed subcutaneously than those in control mice, which received PBS only. In addition, intranasal priming followed by subcutaneous boosting induced higher levels of virus-specific IgG in plasma than those in control mice. The levels of virus-specific nasal IgA were higher in mice that were primed intranasally than in control mice or in mice primed subcutaneously. Furthermore, intranasal priming but not subcutaneous priming provided protection against viral challenge in the upper respiratory tract. In addition, when coupled with subcutaneous boosting, both subcutaneous and intranasal priming protected against viral challenge in the lower respiratory tract. These results indicate that intranasal priming followed by subcutaneous boosting induces both virus-specific IgG in plasma and IgA in nasal washes and protects against virus challenge in both the upper and lower respiratory tracts. Our results will help to develop novel vaccines against influenza viruses and other respiratory viruses.
Keywords: IgA; IgG; Influenza virus; Respiratory tract; Vaccine.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.