The use of non-invasive ventilation in COVID-19: A systematic review

Int J Infect Dis. 2021 May:106:254-261. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.078. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

Abstract

Objective: Guidelines from different regions on the use of non-invasive ventilation in COVID-19 have generally been inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review was to appraise the quality and availability of guidelines, and whether non-invasive ventilation in the early stages of the pandemic is of importance.

Design and method: Databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, as well as websites of international organizations and gray literature, were searched up to June 23, 2020. The reference lists of eligible papers were also hand-searched.

Results: A total of 26 guidelines met the inclusion criteria. According to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, the guidelines' methodological quality was low. Among six domains, Rigour of Development and Editorial Independence were of the lowest quality. Given the lack of evidence from randomized clinical trials and the great variation between different regions, recommendations for non-invasive ventilation have generated considerable debate regarding the early stages of COVID-19.

Conclusions: Improving the methodological quality of the guidelines should be a goal with regard to future pandemics. Additionally, better-designed randomized clinical trials are needed to resolve contradictions regarding the impact of non-invasive ventilation.

Prospero registration number: CRD42020198410.

Keywords: AGREE II; COVID-19; Guidelines; Non-invasive ventilation; Respiratory failure.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19 / therapy*
  • Guidelines as Topic / standards*
  • Humans
  • Noninvasive Ventilation*
  • SARS-CoV-2