Objectives: The purpose of this study was to estimate the ability of antimalarial medications to induce local infiltration analgesia.
Methods: Using a rat model of skin infiltration anaesthesia, the effects of antimalarial medications (primaquine, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and amodiaquine) were compared with the application of lidocaine.
Key findings: At a dose of 3 μmol, primaquine and chloroquine displayed better potency (all P < 0.05) and greater duration (all P < 0.01) of cutaneous analgesia than lidocaine, whereas the other antimalarial medications showed a similar potency and duration of cutaneous analgesia when compared with lidocaine. When a dose of 3 μmol antimalarial medication was used, primaquine was the most potent and had the longest duration of action among four antimalarial medications. The relative potency ranking (ED50, 50% effective dose) has been found to be primaquine [2.10 (1.87 - 2.37) μmol] > lidocaine [6.27 (5.32 -7.39) μmol] (P < 0.01). Infiltration analgesia of skin with primaquine had a greater duration of action than did lidocaine on the equipotent (ED25, ED50, ED75) basis (P < 0.01).
Conclusions: Primaquine and chloroquine have greater potency and longer lasting skin analgesia when compared with lidocaine, while the other antimalarials display a similar potency in comparison with lidocaine.
Keywords: antimalarial drugs; lidocaine; primaquine; skin infiltration anaesthesia.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Pharmaceutical Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.