Performance of 30 commercial SARS-CoV-2 serology assays in testing symptomatic COVID-19 patients

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;40(10):2235-2241. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04232-3. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

Abstract

We report evaluation of 30 assays' (17 rapid tests (RDTs) and 13 automated/manual ELISA/CLIA assay (IAs)) clinical performances with 2594 sera collected from symptomatic patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR on a respiratory sample, and 1996 pre-epidemic serum samples expected to be negative. Only 4 RDT and 3 IAs fitted both specificity (> 98%) and sensitivity (> 90%) criteria according to French recommendations. Serology may offer valuable information during COVID-19 pandemic, but inconsistent performances observed among the 30 commercial assays evaluated, which underlines the importance of independent evaluation before clinical implementation.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Serology.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Viral / blood*
  • COVID-19 / blood*
  • COVID-19 / virology
  • COVID-19 Serological Testing / methods*
  • Humans
  • Immunoassay / economics
  • Immunoassay / methods*
  • Immunoglobulin M / blood
  • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
  • SARS-CoV-2 / genetics
  • SARS-CoV-2 / immunology*
  • SARS-CoV-2 / isolation & purification
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Substances

  • Antibodies, Viral
  • Immunoglobulin M
  • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic