AbstractModels of optimal group size need to identify the currency that correctly captures the fitness consequences of foraging. Although daily intake or daily net energy gain per animal are widely used as currencies, they are not ideal. They predict that all available time should be spent hunting and do not reflect performance during a hunt. We argue that the net rate while hunting is a better currency. Using an example based on the African wild dog, we illustrate the difference between maximizing daily net energy and net rate. Using the same example, we show that if foraging is limited by constraints on energy expenditure, then the optimal group size can be different from the size that maximizes the net rate while hunting. The direction of the effect depends on whether costs increase or decrease with group size. Furthermore, the proportion of time spent resting can be predicted. We suggest two novel approaches for future models: to consider the optimal hunting group size given a fixed group size and to investigate how the presence of dependent young may affect foraging behavior. We hope this will lead to meaningful conclusions on the role cooperative hunting has played in the evolution of sociality in social carnivores.
Keywords: Lycaon pictus; constraints; currencies; efficiency; net rate of energy gain; social carnivores.