Cellular response of human apical papilla cells to calcium hydroxide and tricalcium silicate-based cements

BMC Oral Health. 2021 Mar 9;21(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01467-6.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the biological response of human apical papilla cells to different calcium hydroxide formulations and three tricalcium silicate-based materials.

Methods: Primary cells were obtained from explants of young immature premolars. 20,000 cells adhered for 24 h over discs of Biodentine™, ProRoot®MTA, BioRoot®RCS and calcium hydroxide mixed either with sodium chloride 0.9%w/v or polyethylene glycol and UltraCal® were used to evaluate cell adhesion by scanning electron microscopy and cell viability by MTT assay.

Results: Cells adhered to ProRoot®MTA showed an increase of F-actin like protrusions, suggesting bioactivity. Cells adhered to UltraCal® show protrusion such as filopodia. On the contrary, cells adhered to BioRoot®RCS showed no signs of any cellular protrusion. Regarding viability between the materials, we found a higher percentage of viability in cells cultured over discs of Biodentine™ and ProRoot®MTA.

Conclusion: ProRoot®MTA and Biodentine™ exhibit a better cellular response of human apical papilla cells in vitro conditions compared to BioRoot® and calcium hydroxide diluted in sodium chloride.

Keywords: Apical papilla; Bioceramics; Calcium hydroxide.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aluminum Compounds / pharmacology
  • Calcium Compounds / pharmacology
  • Calcium Hydroxide* / pharmacology
  • Drug Combinations
  • Humans
  • Materials Testing
  • Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
  • Oxides
  • Root Canal Filling Materials*
  • Silicates / pharmacology

Substances

  • Aluminum Compounds
  • Calcium Compounds
  • Drug Combinations
  • Oxides
  • Root Canal Filling Materials
  • Silicates
  • tricalcium silicate
  • Calcium Hydroxide