No-waiting segmentectomy: an optimized approach for segmentectomy

Changchun Wang; Lei Cai; Qian Chen; Xiaofang Xu; Jinxiao Liang; Weimin Mao; Qixun Chen

doi:10.21037/jtd-20-2661

No-waiting segmentectomy: an optimized approach for segmentectomy

J Thorac Dis. 2021 Feb;13(2):784-788. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2661.

Authors

Changchun Wang^{1

2}, Lei Cai^{1

2}, Qian Chen^{1

2}, Xiaofang Xu^{1

2}, Jinxiao Liang^{1

2}, Weimin Mao^{1

2

3}, Qixun Chen^{1

2

3}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
² Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
³ Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment Technology on Thoracic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.

Abstract

Background: Currently, modified inflation-deflation is considered the easiest way to identify the intersegmental plane during pulmonary segmentectomy. However, this approach requires a wait of about 10-20 min during the operative procedure. Therefore, we optimized the procedure, which we call no-waiting segmentectomy. In this study, we compared no-waiting segmentectomy with the modified inflation-deflation method.

Methods: We studied 123 consecutive patients with pulmonary ground-glass nodules who underwent segmentectomy by uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in a single medical group from January 2019 to April 2020. Forty-five patients underwent the modified inflation-deflation method and 78 patients underwent the no-waiting method. The no-waiting procedure involved severing of the target segmental pulmonary artery, inflating the lung with atmospheric air, dissecting the hilum, and dividing the target segmental bronchus. The entire procedure could be performed at a stretch and no pause was needed. We compared the two methods for surgery time, bleeding volume, drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay. Propensity-score matching was used to adjust the baseline characteristics.

Results: Thirty-three pairs of 123 patients were successfully matched. Before propensity-score matching, there was no difference between the two methods in terms of surgery time, bleeding volume, drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay. After propensity-score matching, the surgery time in the no-waiting group was significantly shorter than that in the modified inflation-deflation method group (80.12±35.53 vs. 102.97±48.07 min, P=0.03). There was no difference between the two methods in terms of bleeding volume, drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay.

Conclusions: No-waiting segmentectomy was associated with a reduced surgery time, compared to that associated with modified inflation-deflation segmentectomy. Furthermore, no-waiting segmentectomy did not increase bleeding volume, drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay. Thus, no-waiting segmentectomy is an optional optimized approach for segmentectomy.

Keywords: Pulmonary segmentectomy; intersegmental planes; modified inflation–deflation method; no-waiting.