Background: The primary aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in a prospective cohort of patients over a two-year post-operative period.
Methods: Patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty were prospectively monitored for 24 months post-operatively using the Oxford Shoulder Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire. Any complications or use of health care resources were recorded. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was used to express the cost per quality-adjusted life year gained.
Results: Sixty-seven patients were analysed, 46 primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff arthropathy and 21 revisions from previous arthroplasty. Both indications had comparable peri-operative shoulder scores without significant difference. Using the mean change of EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire at one year, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated at £16,827.43 per quality-adjusted life year, decreasing to £8313.48 per quality-adjusted life year at two years. Primary was associated with a lower incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at two years (primary £7596.76 vs. revision £11,748.51). The estimated post-operative life expectancy of the cohort was 6.9 years with a projected cost per quality-adjusted life year of £2438.78.
Conclusions: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty provides a cost-effective intervention with excellent patient outcomes at two years post-operatively.
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; reverse polarity shoulder arrthroplasty; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
© 2020 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.