Treatment approach and survival from glioblastoma: results from a population-based retrospective cohort study from Western Norway

BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 12;11(3):e043208. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043208.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate treatment and survival from glioblastoma in a real-world setting.

Design and settings: A population-based retrospective cohort study from Western Norway.

Participants: 363 patients aged 18 years or older diagnosed with glioblastoma between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2014.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Overall survival and survival rates determined by Kaplan-Meier method, groups compared by log-rank test. Associations between clinical characteristics and treatment approach assessed by logistic regression. Associations between treatment approach and outcome analysed by Cox regression.

Results: Median overall survival was 10.2 months (95% CI 9.1 to 11.3). Resection was performed in 221 patients (60.9%), and was inversely associated with age over 70 years, higher comorbidity burden, deep-seated tumour localisation and multifocality. Median survival was 13.7 months (95% CI 12.1 to 15.4) in patients undergoing tumour resection, 8.3 months (95% CI 6.6 to 9.9) in patients undergoing biopsy and 4.5 months (95% CI 4.0 to 5.1) in patients where no surgical intervention was performed. Chemoradiotherapy according to the Stupp protocol was given to 157 patients (43%). Age over 70 years, higher comorbidity burden and cognitive impairment were associated with less intensive chemoradiotherapy. Median survival was 16.3 months (95% CI 14.1 to 18.5), 7.9 months (95% CI 6.7 to 9.0) and 2.0 months (95% CI 0.9 to 3.2) in patients treated according to the Stupp protocol, with less intensive chemoradiotherapy and with best supportive care, respectively. Surgical resection (HR 0.61 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.79)) and chemoradiotherapy according to the Stupp protocol (HR 0.09 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.15)) were strongly associated with favourable overall survival, when adjusted for clinical variables.

Conclusions: In a real-world setting, less than half of the patients received full-course chemoradiotherapy, with a median survival comparable to results from clinical trials. Survival was considerably worse in patients receiving less intensive treatment. Our results point out a substantial risk of undertreating glioblastoma, especially in elderly patients.

Keywords: adult oncology; chemotherapy; neurological oncology; radiation oncology.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Aged
  • Brain Neoplasms* / therapy
  • Chemoradiotherapy
  • Cohort Studies
  • Glioblastoma* / therapy
  • Humans
  • Norway / epidemiology
  • Retrospective Studies