Background: There are limited data comparing clinical outcomes between biodegradable polymer and durable polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES and DP-DES, respectively) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Methods and Results: This study enrolled 229 ESRD patients who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for 400 lesions with 472 DES, with 2-year clinical outcomes compared between the BP-DES and DP-DES groups. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR), whereas secondary outcome measures were the occurrence of cardiac death (CD), myocardial infraction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), target vessel revascularization (TVR), non-TVR, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of CD, MI, and TVR. Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors of TLR occurrence. The 2-year incidence of TLR did not differ significantly between the BP-DES and DP-DES groups (P=0.274). In addition, there were no significant differences in the 2-year incidence of CD (P=0.144), MI (P=0.812), ST (P=0.241), TVR (P=0.434), non-TVR (P=0.375), or MACE (P=0.841) between the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis showed that diabetes (P=0.021) was independently associated with TLR occurrence. Conclusions: BP-DES and DP-DES had comparable safety and efficacy profiles over a 2-year follow-up period after PCI in ESRD patients.
Keywords: Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent; Coronary artery disease; Durable polymer drug-eluting stent; End-stage renal disease; Hemodialysis.
Copyright © 2021, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY.