Learning Effectiveness Assessment between Primary School Students and Adults in Basic Life Support Education

Ming-Fang Wang; Yi-Kan Wu; Cheng-Yu Chien; Li-Heng Tsai; Chen-Bin Chen; Chen-June Seak; Chi-Chun Lin; Chien-Hsiung Huang; Chung-Hsien Chaou; Hsiao-Jung Tseng; Chip-Jin Ng

doi:10.1155/2021/5579402

Learning Effectiveness Assessment between Primary School Students and Adults in Basic Life Support Education

Emerg Med Int. 2021 Feb 24:2021:5579402. doi: 10.1155/2021/5579402. eCollection 2021.

Authors

Ming-Fang Wang¹, Yi-Kan Wu¹, Cheng-Yu Chien^{1

2

3}, Li-Heng Tsai¹, Chen-Bin Chen¹, Chen-June Seak¹, Chi-Chun Lin^{1

2}, Chien-Hsiung Huang^{1

4}, Chung-Hsien Chaou¹, Hsiao-Jung Tseng⁵, Chip-Jin Ng¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan.
² Department of Emergency Medicine, Ton-Yen General Hospital, Zhubei, Taiwan.
³ Graduate Institute of Business and Management, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
⁴ Department of Emergency Medicine, New Taipei City Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
⁵ Biostatistical Unit, Clinical Trial Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.

Abstract

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a big issue of critical care. It is well known that bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with an automated external defibrillator (AED) used did improve the survival rate. Therefore, CPR education including basic life support (BLS) and AED has been advocated for years. It showed significant improvement of knowledge and willingness to perform CPR through adolescents after the course. However, little is known regarding the ability and learning effectiveness of school students who attend such courses. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the CPR effectiveness of both adolescents (12 years old) and adults who undergo the same course of BLS and AED.

Methods: This is a retrospective study. Sixth-grade elementary school students in Northern Taiwan were selected to compare with the adult group. Both took 90 minutes of the BLS and AED course by the doctor with BLS instructor qualification. The primary outcomes were CPR quality and passing or failing the skill examination parameters. The secondary outcome was the posttraining written test and questionnaire of CPR willingness.

Results: In the written test, there was a statistical difference in the pretest score except AED knowledge, but no difference was revealed in the posttest score. No statistical difference in CPR quality was noted. In the skill examination, only checking breathing status had statistical difference (elementary group (71%) vs. adult group (86%) (p=0.003)).

Conclusion: We revealed that sixth-grade elementary students' performance in CPR and AED was similar to that of adults after completing the current 90-minute course. Therefore, we strongly advocate offering CPR and AED courses to 12-year-old children, and these courses should emphasize checking the victim's breathing status.