A systematic review and meta-analysis of perforator flaps in plantar defects: Risk analysis of complications

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for complications of perforator flaps in plantar reconstruction. A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases from their inception date up to October 2020. Only studies on reconstructing plantar defects with perforator flaps were included, and specific data were required for each patient in the included studies. A total of 14 studies involving 111 flaps were identified and included in the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis identified two risk factors for postoperative complications: flap size over 50 cm² (risk ratio [RR] = 3.12; P = .02), diabetes mellitus foot (RR = 3.26; P = .03). No significant differences were found regarding heel defects (P = .34), single perforator (P = .57), age older than 60 years (P = .19), chronic aetiology (P = .13), trauma (P = .33), tumour resection (P = .60), ulcer (P = .84), and burn (P = .76). Although more high-quality studies with adequate sample sizes are needed, this meta-analysis indicated that flap size over 50 cm² and diabetes mellitus foot were significant risk factors for postoperative complications of perforator flaps in plantar reconstruction.

Keywords: complication; meta-analysis; perforator flap; plantar defect; risk factor.