Facile copper-based nanofibrous matrix for glucose sensing: Eenzymatic vs. non-enzymatic

Bioelectrochemistry. 2021 Aug:140:107751. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107751. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

Abstract

The current study aims to provide a valid comparison between glucose detection efficiency with an enzymatic and a non-enzymatic sensing platform. A low-cost nano-matrix for glucose sensing was developed by drop-coating copper nanoparticles (Cu NPs) onto a polyacrylonitrile (PAN) electrospun nanofibrous assembly. The PAN NFs/Cu NPs matrix was optimized regarding electrospinning time and Cu NPs content and employed as a non-enzymatic sensor or further modified by cross-linking of glucose oxidase (GOD) for the development of an enzymatic sensor. The non-enzymatic glucose sensor was three times more sensitive (300 mAM-1cm-2) than the enzymatic one (81 mAM-1cm-2) with similar limit of detection values (5.9 and 5.6 µM, respectively). Incorporation of MWCNTs improved both the LOD (3.3 µM) and the operational stability of the non-enzymatic configuration (RSD 7.3%). The interference effect proved insignificant for the enzymatic sensor due to the innate catalytic selectivity whilst the non-enzymatic sensor acquired selectivity due to the nanofibrous PAN matrix and Nafion coating. The non-enzymatic PAN NFs/Cu NPs sensor was chosen for the detection of glucose in real blood serum samples whilst the PAN NFs/Cu NPs/GOD sensor was applied for glucose detection in fruit juices, both proving recovery results close to 100%.

Keywords: Copper nanoparticles; Enzymatic; Glucose sensor; Non-enzymatic; Polyacrylonitrile nanofibers.

MeSH terms

  • Biosensing Techniques / methods
  • Blood Glucose / analysis*
  • Copper / chemistry*
  • Electrochemical Techniques / methods
  • Fruit and Vegetable Juices / analysis*
  • Glucose / analysis*
  • Glucose Oxidase / chemistry
  • Humans
  • Limit of Detection
  • Nanofibers / chemistry*

Substances

  • Blood Glucose
  • Copper
  • Glucose Oxidase
  • Glucose