Using machine learning to identify clotted specimens in coagulation testing

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Mar 3;59(7):1289-1297. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0081. Print 2021 Jun 25.

Abstract

Objectives: A sample with a blood clot may produce an inaccurate outcome in coagulation testing, which may mislead clinicians into making improper clinical decisions. Currently, there is no efficient method to automatically detect clots. This study demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing machine learning (ML) to identify clotted specimens.

Methods: The results of coagulation testing with 192 clotted samples and 2,889 no-clot-detected (NCD) samples were retrospectively retrieved from a laboratory information system to form the training dataset and testing dataset. Standard and momentum backpropagation neural networks (BPNNs) were trained and validated using the training dataset with a five-fold cross-validation method. The predictive performances of the models were then assessed based on the testing dataset.

Results: Our results demonstrated that there were intrinsic distinctions between the clotted and NCD specimens regarding differences in the testing results and the separation of the groups (clotted and NCD) in the t-SNE analysis. The standard and momentum BPNNs could identify the sample status (clotted and NCD) with areas under the ROC curves of 0.966 (95% CI, 0.958-0.974) and 0.971 (95% CI, 0.9641-0.9784), respectively.

Conclusions: Here, we have described the application of ML algorithms in identifying the sample status based on the results of coagulation testing. This approach provides a proof-of-concept application of ML algorithms to evaluate the sample quality, and it has the potential to facilitate clinical laboratory automation.

Keywords: blood clot; coagulation assays; laboratory automation; machine learning; neural network; quality control.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Blood Coagulation Tests
  • Humans
  • Laboratories, Clinical*
  • Machine Learning
  • Noncommunicable Diseases*
  • Retrospective Studies