The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system plays an important role in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and organ transplantations, immune disorders as well as oncological immunotherapy. However, HLA typing remains a challenging task due to the high level of polymorphism and homology among HLA genes. Based on the high-throughput next-generation sequencing data, new HLA typing algorithms and software tools were developed. But there is still a deficit of systematic comparative studies to assist in the selection of the optimal analytical approaches under different conditions. Here, we present a detailed comparison of eight software tools for HLA typing on different real datasets (whole-genome sequencing, whole-exome sequencing and transcriptomic sequencing data) and in-silico samples with different sequencing lengths, depths, and error rates. We figure out the algorithms with the best efficiency in different scenarios, and demonstrate the effect of different raw reads on analytical performances. Our results provide a comprehensive picture of specifications and performances of the eight existing HLA genotyping algorithms, which could assist researchers in selecting the most appropriate tool for specific raw datasets.
Keywords: HLA genotyping; benchmarking; human leukocyte antigens; next-generation sequencing.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.