Seasonal Differences in the Cost and Engagement of Facebook Advertisements for a Physical Activity Smartphone App

Am J Health Promot. 2021 Jul;35(6):803-808. doi: 10.1177/0890117121997304. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of Facebook advertisements for a physical activity smartphone app at different times of the year.

Design: A repeated cross-sectional study examined the cost and engagement levels of advertisements during 3 time points: Post-Easter April-May 2019, Pre-Summer October 2019, and New Year January 2020.

Setting: Advertisements were delivered on Facebook.

Subjects: The target population was Australian females aged 25-60 years.

Measures: Cost was evaluated in terms of reach per dollar. Engagement was evaluated in terms of click-through and app downloads per reach.

Analysis: ANOVA and Chi-square were used to assess differences in reach per dollar, click-through, and app downloads per reach between time points.

Results: Reach per dollar was highest in Post-Easter, but declined in Pre-Summer and New Year (reach/$ 34.8 vs 31.5 vs 27.5; p = .004). Click-through was highest in New Year followed by Post-Easter, then Pre-Summer (click-through 3.2% vs 1.9% vs 1.2%; p < .001). New Year and Post-Easter advertisements achieved higher app downloads per reach than Pre-Summer (downloads 0.9% vs 0.7% vs 0.3%; p < .001).

Conclusion: Facebook advertisements were cheaper in the first time-point, and appear to be getting more expensive (i.e. declining reach/$). Advertisements in the New Year achieved the highest click-through and app downloads per reach, suggesting a useful time of year to promote physical activity products.

Keywords: Easter; Facebook advertising; New Year; online social networks; physical activity; season; summer.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Advertising
  • Australia
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Exercise
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Mobile Applications*
  • Seasons
  • Smartphone
  • Social Media*