Axillary vein access for antiarrhythmic cardiac device implantation: a literature review

J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2021 Apr 1;22(4):237-245. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001044.

Abstract

The current narrative review provides an update of available knowledge on venous access techniques for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation, with a focus on axillary vein puncture. Lower procedure-related and lead-related complications have been reported with extrathoracic vein puncture techniques compared with intrathoracic accesses. In particular, extrathoracic lead access through the axillary vein seems to be associated with lower complication incidence than subclavian vein puncture and higher success rate than cephalic vein cutdown. In literature, many techniques have been described for axillary vein access. The use of contrast venography-guided puncture has facilitated the diffusion of the axillary vein approach for device implantation. Venography may be particularly useful in specific demographic and clinical device implantation contexts. Ultrasound-guided or microwire-guided vascular access for lead positioning can be considered a valid alternative to venography, although current applications for axillary vein puncture need further evaluations.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / therapy*
  • Axillary Vein* / diagnostic imaging
  • Axillary Vein* / surgery
  • Catheterization, Peripheral* / instrumentation
  • Catheterization, Peripheral* / methods
  • Humans
  • Pacemaker, Artificial
  • Prosthesis Implantation* / adverse effects
  • Prosthesis Implantation* / methods
  • Punctures* / adverse effects
  • Punctures* / instrumentation
  • Punctures* / methods
  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Vascular Access Devices / adverse effects