Prognostic significance of pretreatment controlling nutritional status score in urological cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cancer Cell Int. 2021 Feb 19;21(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-01813-2.

Abstract

Background: Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a novel nutrition-based biomarker that has been reported for predicting survival in various cancers. However, the relationship between CONUT score and prognosis of urological cancers remains unclear. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of CONUT score for patients with urological cancers.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were systematically searched up to October 2020. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the association of CONUT score with overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence/disease/progress-free survival (RFS/DFS/PFS) in urological cancers.

Results: A total of 12 articles with 13 studies were included in the analysis. Pooled results indicated that increased CONUT score predicted poor OS (HR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.51-2.09, p < 0.001), CSS (HR: 2.14, 95% CI 1.55-2.97, p < 0.001) and RFS/DFS/PFS (HR: 1.57, 95% CI 1.35-1.84, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by cancer type revealed that high CONUT score associated with worse OS in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urothelial cancer (UC) (HR: 3.05, 95% CI 2.07-4.50, p < 0.001; HR: 1.58, 95% CI 1.32-1.89, p < 0.001). Similar results could be found in CSS (RCC HR: 2.67, 95% CI 1.87-3.81, p < 0.011; UC HR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.09-2.59, p = 0.011) and in RFS/DFS/PFS (RCC HR: 1.96, 95% CI 1.44-2.66, p < 0.001; UC HR: 1.42, 95% CI 1.18-1.71, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: These results illustrated that the high CONUT score may predict worse survival for patients suffering from urological cancers. Therefore, the CONUT score may represent an effective prognostic indicator in urological cancers.

Keywords: CONUT score; Meta‐analysis; Prognosis; Urological cancers.

Publication types

  • Review