Guidance and evidence to support best practices in rotating between gabapentinoids is lacking. This retrospective cohort study was performed to describe and evaluate strategies for rotation. Patients rotated while admitted from June 1st, 2014 to April 25th, 2020 at a large, academic medical center were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of rotations using a direct switch strategy compared to a cross-taper strategy. Secondary outcomes were successful rotation, defined as stable or improved pain scores pre- to post-rotation, dose ratios, and adverse effects. A total of 67 patients were included. Median age was 50 years (35 - 59) and 58% (38) were male. The majority used a direct switch strategy (87%). Ninety-five percent of patients using the direct switch strategy and 78% of patients using the cross-taper strategy were successful. There was no difference in strategies between those who were successful and those who were not. Post hoc analysis of patients with normal renal function (eGFR ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73 m2) found that those who were successful were more likely to have used a direct switch strategy (p = 0.048). There were no differences in adverse effects. These findings suggest that either strategy is reasonable for gabapentinoid rotation in the inpatient setting.
Keywords: Gabapentin; gabapentinoid rotation; pregabalin.