Hospital Competition and Unplanned Readmission: Evidence from a Systematic Review

Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Feb 5:14:473-489. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S290643. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Competition has been widely introduced among hospitals in the hope of improving health-care quality. However, whether competition leads to higher-quality health care is a topic of considerable debate. We conducted a systematic review to assess the impact of hospital-market competition on unplanned readmission. We searched six electronic databases (PubMed, EmBase, Wiley Online Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and JSTOR) and reference lists of screened articles for relevant studies, and strictly followed methods proposed by the Cochrane Collaboration. Finally, nine observational studies with 2,241,767 patients were included. For the primary outcome, pooled results of three studies showed that it was uncertain whether or not hospital competition reduces readmission (β=0.02, P=0.06; very low certainty of evidence, as they were all observational studies with high heterogeneity). Inconsistent results were found in the remaining six studies, and they were assessed as very low-certainty evidence, downgraded for either inconsistency or indirectness or both. As for secondary outcomes, seven of the nine studies reported on the impact of competition on the risk of mortality, and two reported on length of stay (LOS). It was uncertain whether competition had an effect on mortality or LOS. The relevant studies were limited and of very low certainty, which means there is currently no reliable evidence showing that hospital competition reduces quality of health care in terms of readmission/mortality/LOS. There is a need for rigorous studies to assess the impact of hospital competition on the quality of health care.

Keywords: competition; health policy; hospital market; quality of care; readmission.

Publication types

  • Review

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant 71874116, Ministry of Education of China under grant 18YJA790062, Chengdu Federation of Social Science Association under grant ZZ05, Sichuan University under grants 2018SCUH0027 and SKSYL201811, and China Medical Board under grant 17-276.