Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major cause of death and disability in the United States. Cardiac arrest centers (CAC) are necessary for the management of these critically ill and complex post arrest patients due to their specialized services and provider expertise. We report the case of a patient with OHCA and the systems of care involved in his resuscitation and recovery. Case Report: Emergency medical services attended a 39-year-old male with ongoing bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after a witnessed collapse. Despite receiving appropriate advanced cardiac life support, including three defibrillations, he remained in refractory ventricular fibrillation. A prehospital physician identified him as an extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) candidate due to his age, witnessed arrest, refractory rhythm, and functional status. He was expedited to a CAC but no longer qualified for ECPR due to the time limit. He was resuscitated by the multiple teams activated prior to his arrival. He eventually had sustained return of circulation, was taken to the catheterization lab for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention, and recovered with a good neurologic outcome. Conclusion: Cardiac arrest centers may be capable of advanced interventions including ECPR. However, the systems of care offered by these centers is itself a lifesaving intervention. As this case highlights, despite not receiving the specified intervention (ECPR) the systems of care required to offer such a resource led to this favorable outcome.
Keywords: anoxic brain injury; anoxic coma; cardiac arrest; outcome; prehospital care; prognostication; refractory ventricular fibrillation.