Rapid and accurate identification of staphylococcal pneumonia is crucial for effective antimicrobial stewardship. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) from lower respiratory tract (LRT) samples from suspected pneumonia patients to avoid superfluous empirical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) treatment. PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library Database were searched from inception to 2 September 2020. Data analysis was carried out using a bivariate random-effects model to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). Of 1,808 citations, 24 publications comprising 32 data sets met our inclusion criteria. Twenty-two studies (n = 4,630) assessed the accuracy of the NAAT for methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) detection, while 10 studies (n = 2,996) demonstrated the accuracy of the NAAT for MRSA detection. The pooled NAAT sensitivity and specificity (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) for all MSSA detection were higher (sensitivity of 0.91 [95% CI, 0.89 to 0.94], specificity of 0.94 [95% CI, 0.94 to 0.95]) than those of MRSA (sensitivity of 0.75 [95% CI, 0.69 to 0.80], specificity of 0.88 [95% CI, 0.86 to 0.89]) in lower respiratory tract (LRT) samples. NAAT pooled sensitivities differed marginally among different LRT samples, including sputum, endotracheal aspirate (ETA), and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. Noticeably, NAAT pooled specificity against microbiological culture was consistently ≥88% across various types of LRT samples. A meta-regression and subgroup analysis of study design, sample condition, and patient selection method could not explain the heterogeneity (P > 0.05) in the diagnostic efficiency. This meta-analysis has demonstrated that the NAAT can be applied as the preferred initial test for timely diagnosis of staphylococcal pneumonia in LRT samples for successful antimicrobial therapy.
Keywords: NAAT accuracy; Staphylococcus; antimicrobial therapy; clinical therapeutics; diagnostics; meta-analysis; pneumonia; staphylococcal pneumonia.