Evolutionary advantages of turning points in human cooperative behaviour

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 9;16(2):e0246278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246278. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Cooperation is crucial to overcome some of the most pressing social challenges of our times, such as the spreading of infectious diseases, corruption and environmental conservation. Yet, how cooperation emerges and persists is still a puzzle for social scientists. Since human cooperation is individually costly, cooperative attitudes should have been eliminated by natural selection in favour of selfishness. Yet, cooperation is common in human societies, so there must be some features which make it evolutionarily advantageous. Using a cognitive inspired model of human cooperation, recent work Realpe-Gómez (2018) has reported signatures of criticality in human cooperative groups. Theoretical evidence suggests that being poised at a critical point provides evolutionary advantages to groups by enhancing responsiveness of these systems to external attacks. After showing that signatures of criticality can be detected in human cooperative groups composed by Moody Conditional Cooperators, in this work we show that being poised close to a turning point enhances the fitness and make individuals more resistant to invasions by free riders.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biological Evolution*
  • Cooperative Behavior*
  • Humans
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Prisoner Dilemma

Grants and funding

For G. A. and D. V., this work was partially supported by the Knut and Wallenberg Grant “How do human norms form and change?” (2016.0167), the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme Project PROTON “Modelling the Processes leading to Organised crime and Terrorist Networks” (No.: 699824), by the Eranet FLAG-ERA Call 2016 Project FuturICT 2.0 – “Large scale experiments and simulations for the second generation of FuturICT” (CUP: B84E16000780005), and the Italian Research Project of National Relevance (PRIN) "14ALL: One for all, all for one. Reputational mechanisms for aggression, revenge, and forgiveness in intergroup relationships". J. R.-G. would like to thank FAPESP grant 2016/01343-7 for funding my visit to ICTP-SAIFR from 20-27 January 2019 where part of this work was done.