Purpose of review: The purpose of this review was to highlight the current recommendations, data, and limitations for methods of cardiovascular screening in athletes.
Recent findings: While the history and physical (H&P) alone remains the cornerstone for preparticipation cardiovascular screening (PPCS) in athletes, the advent of modern electrocardiographic (ECG) screening criteria has drastically increased sensitivity and decreased false positive rates for screening. Advanced imaging techniques remain an important component of secondary testing after an athlete has an abnormal initial screening exam, however, the use of imaging for universal screening has not been rigorously tested to date. Current disqualification guidelines have now begun to emphasize shared decision making between the provider and athlete in situations of clinical equipoise.
Summary: All major medical and sporting societies recommend PPCS using a focused medical history and physical examination for all competitive athletes, but there remains controversy about the role of ECG and advanced imaging in PPCS. Future research should focus on the creation of a randomized trial that is powered for mortality that can truly assess the utility of PPCS in athletes.
Keywords: athlete; cardiac screening; echocardiography; electrocardiography; pre-participation screening.