Aim: Currently, there is no reliable methodology to evaluate the dimensional conformity of dental prostheses manufactured through a digital shaping process. In the CAD/CAM method, the digital design of the prosthesis is considered as a reference, and it is crucial to reproduce it perfectly during the manufacturing process. Therefore, the aim of this study was to offer a comparison between a CAM prosthesis and its design model by superimposing the CAD model with the digitization of the manufactured prosthesis.
Materials and methods: The metrological inspection developed in this study and presented in this article involved a comparison of the points cloud obtained by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and the CAD model of the prosthesis. First, an estimation of all inspection-method induced measurement errors was carried out, in which the measurement errors were assessed by proceeding to the dimensional inspection of a reference object of known dimensions. Then, the metrological inspection was extrapolated to a dental prosthesis.
Results: The estimation of measurement errors presented satisfying results compared with the usual metrological protocols developed by the dentistry research community. The dimensional deviation was estimated at 0.31% and the form deviation at 0.165 µm between the Gaussian sphere and the certified ball. The inspection of the manufactured surfaces revealed under-milled areas on the occlusal face, particularly on the anatomical fossae, and an irregular margin limit compared with its smooth design.
Conclusion: A reliable micro-CT evaluation of the dimensional accuracy of a manufactured dental prosthesis compared with the CAD model demonstrated the performance level of CAD/CAM systems. The evaluation reliability was confirmed by the estimation of prior measurement errors. This estimation is essential for the metrological analysis.
Keywords: 3D imaging; CAD/CAM; dental marginal adaptation; dental prosthesis; dimensional measurement accuracy; micro-CT.