Objectives: The purpose of our study was to compare three definitions of ambulatory blood pressure (BP) nocturnal period and to assess their agreement in determining nocturnal BP dipping patterns.
Methods: We investigated 69 subjects with metabolic syndrome, aged 50-55 years. In all subjects, we assessed 24-h BP monitoring, electrocardiogram and actigraphy profiles. The nocturnal period was defined in three ways: as a fixed narrow nighttime period from 01:00 to 06:00, as a self-reported sleeping period and as a disappearance and onset of physical activity recorded by the actigraph.
Results: Our study revealed a significant discrepancy between the self-reported and actigraphy-based nocturnal periods (P < 0.001). In addition, different definitions of the nighttime yielded significant differences in determining nondipping, extreme dipping and dipping BP patterns, the identification of the latter being affected the most. The actigraphy-based approach best aligned with the fixed-time determination of the nocturnal period: Cohen's kappa coefficient for the nondipping pattern was 0.78 (0.58-1), for the dipping pattern 0.75 (0.59-0.91) and for the extreme dipping pattern 0.81 (0.65-0.97). In comparison to the self-reported determination of the nocturnal period, using the actigraphy-based approach resulted in reclassifying the nocturnal BP pattern in 20.3% of subjects.
Conclusions: The lack of agreement between fixed-time, self-reported and actigraphy-based determinations of the nighttime period affects the identification of the nocturnal BP patterns. In comparison to the self-reported nocturnal period estimation, the actigraphy-based approach results in the reclassification of BP dipping status in every fifth subject.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.