Validation of the Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index for Use in Community-Dwelling Individuals With SCI

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Feb;103(2):191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.009. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index (SCI-FI) instruments in a community-dwelling sample.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Community setting.

Participants: Individuals (N=269) recruited from 6 SCI Model Systems sites.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Participants completed computer adaptive test and short form versions of 4 SCI-FI/Capacity (C) banks (ie, Ambulation, Basic Mobility, Fine Motor, Self-Care) and 1 SCI-FI/Assistive Technology (AT) bank (Wheelchair Mobility) at baseline and after 2 weeks. The Self-Report Functional Measure (SRFM) and the clinician-rated motor FIM were used to evaluate evidence of convergent validity.

Results: Pearson correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients, minimal detectable change, and Bland-Altman plots supported the test-retest reliability of the SCI-FI instruments. Correlations were large with the SRFM (.69-.89) and moderate-to-large for the FIM instrument (.44-.64), supporting convergent validity. Known-groups validity was demonstrated by a significant main effect of injury level on all instruments and a main effect of injury completeness on the SCI-FI/C instruments. A ceiling effect was detected for individuals with incomplete paraplegia on the Fine Motor/C and Self-Care/C Short Forms.

Conclusion: Findings support the test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and known-groups validity of the SCI-FI/C instruments and the SCI-FI/AT Wheelchair Mobility instruments for use by community-dwelling individuals.

Keywords: Patient-reported outcome measures; Psychometrics; Quality of life; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Disability Evaluation
  • Humans
  • Independent Living*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Spinal Cord Injuries*