Survey-derived best management practices for backyard beekeepers improve colony health and reduce mortality

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 15;16(1):e0245490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245490. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Honey bee colony losses in the US have exceeded acceptable levels for at least a decade, leaving beekeepers in need of management practices to improve colony health and survival. Here, an empirical Best Management Practice (BMP) regimen was tested, comprised of the top four management practices associated with reduced colony mortality in backyard beekeeping operations according to Bee Informed Partnership Loss and Management survey results. Seven study locations were established across the US, and each location consisted of ten colonies treated according to empirical BMPs and ten according to average beekeeping practice. After 3 years, colonies treated according to empirical BMPs experienced reduced Varroa infestation, viral infection, and mortality compared to colonies managed with Average practices. In addition, BMP colonies produced more new colonies via splits. The colonies under Average practices were given chemical Varroa treatments only once per year, and thus spent more months above economic threshold of 3.0 mites/100 bees. Increased time spent above the economic threshold was significantly correlated to both increased viral infection and colony mortality. This study demonstrates the cumulative effects of management and colony health stressors over months and years, especially the dire importance of regular Varroa monitoring and management.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Beekeeping / methods*
  • Bees* / parasitology
  • Conservation of Natural Resources
  • Mortality*
  • Risk Factors
  • Seasons
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*

Grants and funding

This project was funded by a Coordinated Agricultural Project (CAP) grant from US Department of Agriculture-National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA); award # 2016-68004-24832. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.