Adaptation and validation of a German version of the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):e0245127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245127. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The Strength Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) Questionnaire has been shown to be a reliable instrument for the measurement of its four dimensions perceived organizational support for strengths use, perceived organizational support for deficit correction, strengths use behavior, and deficit correction behavior in the context of organizations. This paper aims to adapt and validate the SUDCO for the German-speaking population (SUDCO-G). Three studies were conducted. Confirmatory factor analyses and correlations with other psychological constructs on the data of three German samples (N1 = 302; N2 = 243, N3 = 295) were performed. The twenty-four item SUDCO-G exhibits the anticipated factorial structure with four factors and an acceptable model fit in all three studies (CFI = .920-.937, TLI = .911-.929, RMSEA = .063-.079, SRMR = 0.52-.075). The associations of the four dimensions to other constructs concur with previous findings (study 2) and the subscales of the SUDCO-G also show positive relations with general strengths use, meaning of work and Psychological Capital (study 3). We conclude that the SUDCO-G is a reliable and valid instrument for the use in the German-speaking population.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Models, Psychological*
  • Psychometrics
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*

Grants and funding

we did not receive funding for this work.