Intention matters more than attention: Item-method directed forgetting of items at attended and unattended locations

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1629-1651. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02220-x. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

Abstract

This study embedded attentional cues in the study phase of an item-method directed forgetting task. We used an unpredictive onset cue (Experiment 1), a predictive onset cue (Experiment 2), or a predictive central cue (Experiments 3-6) to direct attention to the left or right. In Experiments 1-5, this was followed by a pink or blue study word that required a speeded colour discrimination; in Experiment 6, it was followed by a pink or blue word or nonword that required a lexical decision. Each study word was followed by an instruction to Remember or Forget. A yes-no recognition test confirmed better recognition of to-be-remembered words than to-be-forgotten words; a cueing effect confirmed the effectiveness of predictive cues in allocating attentional resources. There was, however, no evidence that the directed forgetting effect differed for attended and unattended words: Encoding depends more on the memory intention formed after a study word has disappeared than on the availability of processing resources when that word first appears.

Keywords: Attention; Encoding; Intentional forgetting; Item-method directed forgetting.

MeSH terms

  • Cues
  • Humans
  • Intention*
  • Memory
  • Mental Recall*
  • Recognition, Psychology