Grossing and reporting of a soft tissue tumor specimen in surgical pathology: Rationale, current evidence, and recommendations

Indian J Cancer. 2021 Jan-Mar;58(1):17-27. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_738_20.

Abstract

Soft tissue tumors, including sarcomas are complex and diagnostically challenging tumors. This is as a result of their heterogeneity and overlapping clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and also molecular features, the latter to some extent. More than 80 types of sarcoma have been described. Current management, which is best offered at centers with active multidisciplinary care, is based on balancing oncologic and functional outcomes in such cases. This has transcended into the types of specimens received for grossing these rather uncommon tumors. Over the years, diagnostic specimens have reduced in their sizes from, open biopsies to core needle biopsies. These specimens need to be adequately and judiciously triaged for ancillary techniques, such as molecular testing. Conservative surgeries have led to resected specimens for marginal assessment. Lately, post neoadjuvant (chemotherapy or radiation therapy)-treated resection specimens of soft tissue sarcomas are being submitted for surgical pathology reporting. This article focuses on the grossing of soft tissue tumors, including sarcomas, in terms of types of specimens, grossing techniques including rationale, tissue triage, reporting, and recommendations from the surgical pathologists actively engaged in reporting musculoskeletal tumors, based on current evidence.

Keywords: Core needle biopsy; excision specimens; grossing soft tissue tumor; margins; soft tissue sarcoma; soft tissue tumor specimen.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Pathology, Surgical / methods*
  • Soft Tissue Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Soft Tissue Neoplasms / surgery